A2j

“Cost of defending yourself” by David Dorson

By: April Lount, University of Manitoba, Student at the Faculty of Law The recent Law 360 article entitled “Cost of defending yourself” by David Dorson  provides a sobering perspective of the cost relationship to quality criminal defence and the severe consequences when you are not able to meet those costs. Dorson is a pen name, providing […]

“Cost of defending yourself” by David Dorson Read More »

Expanding the Mandatory Pro Bono Discourse

By April Lount, University of Manitoba, Student at the Faculty of Law Pro bono stands as perhaps the single most revered practice within the legal sector, embodying a selfless dedication to justice and the public good. These principles not only align with the ideal model of advocacy, but also directly contribute to access to justice,

Expanding the Mandatory Pro Bono Discourse Read More »

Complaint Backlog at Canadian Transportation Agency Frustrates Air Passenger Rights

Written by Eric Epp Justice delayed is justice denied. This maxim may be all too familiar for thousands of travelers who have filed complaints with the Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA). The CTA is the administrative body tasked with adjudicating complaints surrounding air travel in Canada between airlines and travelers, in addition to issuing licenses for

Complaint Backlog at Canadian Transportation Agency Frustrates Air Passenger Rights Read More »

Attraction and Retention of Lawyers in Rural Manitoba

By Eric Epp It is clear there are not enough lawyers practicing in rural and remote Manitoba. The attraction and retention of lawyers in rural and remote communities is increasingly becoming a deep issue of accessibility to justice. The majority of Manitobans, around 60%, reside in or around Winnipeg. Manitoba’s legal profession is not reflective

Attraction and Retention of Lawyers in Rural Manitoba Read More »

Rule 2.04: An Underutilized Rule in Manitoba Civil Procedure?

Written by Gerard Kennedy Effective January 1, 2018, many amendments were made to the Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench Rules (the “QB Rules”), designed to resolve cases more proportionately, and thus more in accordance with access to justice. One of these, Rule 2.04 of the QB Rules, has rarely been used. But after the Manitoba Court of Appeal

Rule 2.04: An Underutilized Rule in Manitoba Civil Procedure? Read More »

Scroll to Top